How to Structure Google Ads for Ecommerce in 2025
Most Ecommerce brands are leaving revenue on the table because their Google Ads account structure is holding them back. Here is the framework we use at Big Flare to build accounts that scale.
Most Ecommerce brands we audit have the same structural problems — too many campaigns fighting over the same budget, shopping campaigns without any negative keyword logic, and Performance Max cannibalising their best-performing search terms.
Structure is not glamorous. But it is the single biggest lever on account performance.
Start with Intent Segmentation
The first principle is to segment your campaigns by purchase intent, not by product category.
Your audience exists on a spectrum. At the top, someone is browsing “best running shoes.” At the bottom, they are searching “buy Hoka Clifton 9 size 10 mens free shipping.” These two people need completely different bids, ads, and landing pages.
Building one campaign to serve both is where the money gets lost.
We typically build three intent layers:
- Brand + exact product — your highest-intent, lowest-CPA traffic. Protect it with tight match types and aggressive bids.
- Category + competitor — medium intent. Wider match types, tighter audience signals.
- Awareness / demand capture — Performance Max or broad Display. Separate budget, separate reporting.
Performance Max Placement
Performance Max should supplement your search and shopping campaigns, not replace them.
The common mistake is to run one PMax campaign across your entire product catalogue and call it done. PMax works well when it has clean signals — your customer lists, your converters, your high-value segments. Without those signals, it defaults to prospecting, and you pay awareness CPMs on a conversion-rate budget.
Run PMax on your top 20% of products. Keep the rest in Standard Shopping with manual or Target ROAS bidding where you have the conversion volume to support it.
Shopping Campaign Architecture
For most Ecommerce brands doing $500K–$5M in annual revenue, we recommend a tiered Shopping structure:
- Priority High campaign — your hero SKUs, small budget, max CPC caps to protect margin
- Priority Medium campaign — core catalogue, Target ROAS once you have 30+ conversions/month per campaign
- Priority Low campaign — long-tail and clearance, broad match, lowest bids
Each tier uses negatives from the tier above to prevent bid cannibalisation. This is called a “priority waterfall” and it gives you explicit control over where Google spends first.
What This Looks Like in Practice
One of our clients — a bedding brand — came to us with seven campaigns all targeting the same top-20 products. The campaigns were competing against each other in auction, inflating their own CPCs by roughly 30%.
After restructuring into three intent tiers with proper negative keyword architecture, their average CPC dropped from $1.84 to $1.27 within 60 days. Same products, same bids, better structure.
Account structure is not a one-time project. It needs quarterly reviews as your catalogue, margins, and seasonal demand shift.
If you want a second opinion on your current structure, that is what the Free Growth Roadmap is for. Daryl will review your account personally and show you where the structural problems are.
More Articles
All ArticlesWhy You Should Run Google Shopping Ads on Your Own Brand Name
Let’s talk about something I see a lot of ecommerce brands get wrong… Running Google Shopping ads on their own brand name. Most people ask me something along the lines of: “Should I run Google Shopping ads on my brand
The 4 Campaign Google Ads Structure That Boosted Our Clients’ ROAS
Today, I’m showing you a game-changing Google Ads campaign structure that we use across loads of ecommerce client accounts at my agency, Big Flare. This structure has helped us generate over $150 million in ecommerce